Home Business Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Snowflake Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit By Investing.com

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Snowflake Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit By Investing.com

0
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Snowflake Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit By Investing.com

[ad_1]

SAN DIEGO, April 06, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Snowflake Inc . (NYSE: NYSE:) Class A common stock between September 16, 2020 and March 2, 2022, inclusive (the Class Period), have until April 29, 2024 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Snowflake class action lawsuit. Captioned Flannery v. Snowflake Inc., No. 24-cv-01234 (N.D. Cal.), the Snowflake class action lawsuit charges Snowflake as well as certain of its top executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Snowflake class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-snowflake-inc-class-action-lawsuit-snow.html

You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Lead plaintiff motions for the Snowflake class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than April 29, 2024.

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Snowflake is a cloud data platform that enables its enterprise customers to consolidate data into a single source to build data-driven applications and share data.

The Snowflake class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Snowflake had systematically oversold capacity to customers which created a misleading appearance of the demand for Snowflake’s products and services; (ii) Snowflake had provided significant discounts to its customers prior to its initial public offering (IPO) that temporarily boosted sales but would not be sustainable after the IPO and/or necessitate platform efficiency adjustments that negatively impacted client consumption and Snowflake’s revenue and profit margins; (iii) as a result, Snowflake’s customers were poised to roll over a material amount of unused credits (and thereby cannibalize future sales) at the end of their contracts’ terms or to refuse to renew their contracts at prior consumption levels or at all; and (iv) consequently, Snowflake’s product revenue and remaining performance obligations had been artificially inflated leading up to and during the Class Period.

On March 2, 2022, Snowflake revealed that its product revenue growth rate for fiscal 2023 was projected to be slashed to a range of 65% to 67%, far below the triple-digit growth and purportedly ongoing favorable business trends highlighted by defendants during the Class Period. On a related earnings call also held on March 2, 2022, Snowflake CFO, defendant Michael P. Scarpelli, further revealed that Snowflake customers were consuming at a reduced rate, which he blamed on platform enhancements . . . which lowered credit consumption. On this news, the price of Snowflake Class A common stock fell nearly 28% over several trading sessions, damaging investors.

The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud. You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Snowflake Class A common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Snowflake class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Snowflake class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Snowflake class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery of the Snowflake class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller is one of the world’s leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. The Firm is ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report for recovering more than $1.75 billion for investors in 2022 “ the third year in a row Robbins Geller tops the list. And in those three years alone, Robbins Geller recovered nearly $5.3 billion for investors, more than double the amount recovered by any other plaintiffs’ firm. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest securities class action recovery ever “ $7.2 billion “ in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Attorney advertising.  
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.  
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

Contact:
           Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
           J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
           655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
           800-449-4900
           [email protected]



[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here