Elon Musk has despatched a 3rd letter to Twitter trying to terminate his $44 billion acquisition of the corporate. Musk’s authorized workforce cited Twitter’s multimillion greenback severance cost to former safety chief and whistleblower Peiter Zatko as a violation of the merger settlement and a purpose to finish the deal. The letter, dated September ninth, was despatched to Twitter’s chief authorized officer Vijaya Gadde, and was included in a submitting Twitter made with the SEC on Friday (which you’ll be able to learn on the backside of this text).

Final month, Zatko made headlines by accusing Twitter of deceptive traders concerning the variety of bots on the service, failing to delete customers’ information, and having poor safety practices, amongst different issues. Musk jumped on the accusations, citing them in his second termination letter and subpoenaing Zatko to testify within the lawsuit. Zatko was set to be deposed on Friday.

Elon Musk despatched his first letter of termination in July, saying that Twitter mislead him concerning the variety of bots on its platform, and that the corporate wouldn’t give him entry to the knowledge he have to make his personal determinations. That is even though he was given entry to the “firehose” API that incorporates each tweet.

On Thursday, the Wall Avenue Journal reported that Twitter had agreed to pay Zatko roughly $7 million earlier than he left the corporate, in relation to misplaced compensation after he and the corporate negotiated about pay for months. Musk’s attorneys are citing it as but another excuse why his deal to buy the social media firm shouldn’t undergo. The acquisition settlement bars Twitter from offering any out-of-the-ordinary severance or termination funds. Based on the Journal, the settlement isn’t significantly unusual, on condition that Zatko was an government leaving the corporate, nevertheless it looks as if Musk doesn’t agree. (The letter additionally mentions Musk didn’t be taught concerning the separation settlement till Twitter filed it with the court docket.)

Whether or not Musk is definitely allowed to terminate the deal is a matter for a court docket in Delaware after Twitter sued Musk in July for making an attempt to desert the deal. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick has already dominated that Musk might be allowed to make use of Zatko’s allegations to assist his case, and that there might be a “restricted” discovery on paperwork associated to the whistleblower’s report. In August, Musk filed the second discover of termination, citing the unique reviews.

The trial is set to start on October seventeenth. Twitter didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.